Significant changes through multilateral organisations
Multilateral cooperation allows Finland to influence decisions that provide solutions to complex global challenges. Strengthening this work was one of the objectives of the Government Programme in 2019.
In 2019-2021, approximately half of Finland's development cooperation appropriations were channelled through international organisations and the EU. The success of cooperation is monitored annually with the help of Finland's own policy influencing plans. In addition to this, international evaluations and separate evaluations are implemented.
The international MOPAN network evaluates the management and results of multilateral actors. In 2019-2021, MOPAN published evaluations of 25 multilateral actors. According to the evaluations, Finland's most important partners were very successful in achieving their objectives. It was determined that performance was only hampered at the Global Environment Facility (GEF) due to the slowness of its project cycle. The evaluations found that the UN Population Fund UNFPA, UN Women and UNICEF had accomplished their objectives exceptionally well. However, most partners still had room for improvement in the cost-effectiveness of their operations.
The first independent evaluation of Finland's influence on 23 multilateral partner organisations was completed in 2020. The evaluation confirms that Finland has achieved significant changes in the strategies, policies and operating methods of the organisations. Finland has had more influence than could be expected on the basis of the funding it provides or the share of votes it has.
In the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the competent and experienced personnel, thematic expertise, long-term and multi-channel activities including cooperation with other actors have been the cornerstones of policy influence. Finland has gained a reputation as a theme leader, especially in the areas of gender equality, the rights of persons with disabilities, education, technology and innovation.
For example, Finland's investment in experts in inclusive education and the rights of persons with disabilities has produced concrete results in the World Bank's strategies and educational materials. Finland has also played an active role in mainstreaming the inclusion of persons with disabilities during the International Development Agency’s (IDA) additional funding rounds in 2019-2021.
According to the evaluation, the management of policy influence at the Ministry for Foreign Affairs has promoted learning, the establishment of good practices and reporting to Parliament. However, the added value produced by the policy influencing plans in relation to the work done is not always considered sufficient. Challenges related to the work include limited human resources and available time. Furthermore, current or previous Finnish employees of multilateral organisations have hardly been utilised in advocacy work. The evaluation encourages the continuation and strategic development of policy influence.
International assessment of the ability of Finland's 13 multilateral partners to achieve their targets
- Very good
- Good
- Weak
- Poor
- Not applicable
- Indicator not used
|
UNFPA
|
UN Women
|
GEF
|
FAO
|
UNICEF
|
ADB
|
IFAD
|
WFP
|
WHO
|
UNHCR
|
UNOPS
|
UNRWA
|
UNDP
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall assessment of the achievement of the targets | |||||||||||||
Results considered achieved | |||||||||||||
Benefits to target groups | |||||||||||||
Ability to influence national policies | |||||||||||||
Results in gender equality | |||||||||||||
Environmental results | |||||||||||||
Administrative results | |||||||||||||
Significance to partners | |||||||||||||
Efficiency in delivering results | |||||||||||||
Sustainability of results |
- 1
An entry is made in connection with new funding decisions based on the targets set on a scale comprising human rights blind, human rights sensitive (taking human rights into account), human rights progressive (promoting human rights) and human rights transformative (addressing human rights challenges) or not specified.
- 2
The entries are made on the basis of target-setting in connection with new funding decisions. The sample contains the funding decisions which have the promotion of gender equality as the principal or significant objective.
- 3
A three-year average of decisions involving funding that supports equality. For example, the figure for 2017 shows the average for 2015-2017.
- 4
Multilateral Organisation Performance Assessment Network.
- 5
OECD DAC Corruption Risk Management Recommendations 2016. https://www.oecd.org/corruption/oecd-recommendation-for-development-cooperation-actors-on-managing-risks-of-corruption.htm
- 6
London Safeguarding Summit 2018 commitments. https://www.gov.uk/ government/collections/safeguarding-summit-commitments
- 7
The Ministry for Foreign Affairs (16 May 2022): Table 4. Development financing payments to Finland’s largest partner countries 2016-2021. https://um.fi/documents/35732/0/Tilastoliite+2021%2C+osa2. pdf/47739300-0dac-50c8-d9ce-706195ee8070?t=1649772600686
- 8
MOPAN (16 May 2022) MOPAN Assessment library https://www. mopanonline.org/assessments/
- 9
MOPAN: 2017-18 ASSESSMENTS, Global Environment Facility (GEF) 2019. https://www.mopanonline.org/assessments/gef2017-18/GEF%20 Report.pdf
- 10
MOPAN: 2017-18 ASSESSMENTS, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) 2019.
https://www.mopanonline.org/assessments/unfpa2017-18/UNFPA%20Report.pdf - 11
MOPAN: 2017-18 ASSESSMENTS, UN Women 2019. https://www.mopanonline.org/assessments/unwomen2017-18/Final_assessment_UN_Women_2019_02_14.pdf
- 12
MOPAN: Assessment Report United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2021. https://www.mopanonline.org/assessments/unicef2020/MOPAN%20Assessment%20UNICEF%20web%20[for%20download].pdf
- 13
Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland (2020). Finnish Development Policy Influencing Activities in Multilateral Organisations, Volume 1, Main report. https://um.fi/documents/384998/0/Vol1+_MainReport_Evaluation+of+Finnish+Development+Policy+Influencing+Activities+in+Multilateral+Organisations+%281%29.pdf/2666cd6a-0bb2-1c76-0659-db1ac6fa30bf?t=1591860985653
- 14
A more in-depth examination was conducted by the World Bank Group, UNFPA, UNICEF, the World Food Programme WFP, UN Women, International Fund for Agricultural Development IFAD, the Food and Agriculture Organization FAO and the International Trade Centre ITC.
- 15
MOPAN: 2017-18 ASSESSMENTS, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) 2019. https://www.mopanonline.org/assessments/ifad2017-18/IFAD%20Report.pdf
- 16
African Development Bank Group (2022). Annual Development Effectiveness Review 2022. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/annual-development-effectiveness-review-2022
- 17
European Commission (2021). Global Europe: Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument. https://ec.europa.eu/ info/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/global-europe-neighbourhood-development-and-international-cooperation-instrument_fi
- 18
One of the organisations receiving programme support is Fingo, the members of which include 270 Finnish civil society organisations.
The International Fund for Agricultural Development is able to reach poor small-scale farmers
Vahvuudet
- A clear main task supported by a strategy
- Regular stakeholder cooperation
- Transparent allocation of resources
- An organisational structure that supports effectiveness
- Striving towards results-based budgeting
- Speed of payments
- Assessment and development of organisational capacity
- Reaching the beneficiaries in most vulnerable situations
- More systematic use of result data and previous experiences
Pandemic funding by development banks was flexible and rapid
In addition to the health sector, the crisis package also financed social security and business subsidies in 2020-2021, which benefitted almost 30 million of Africa’s poorest households and more than 300,000 small and medium-sized enterprises. COVID-19 testing capacity of partner countries was increased to approximately 12 times what it initially was. The funding also helped to train and educate more than 130,000 people to support health care and to double the number of intensive care units intended for COVID-19 patients.